In the 10 years since Sandy Hook, “good guys with guns” have been present or quickly arrived at the scene of nearly every major mass shooting and failed to stop the gunman before he was able to take multiple lives. “Good guys with guns don’t always win gunfights”
A Harvard University study that analyzed data from 2007 to 2011 found that of more than 14,000 crimes in which a victim was present, just under 1% involved a gun used in self defense. The Harvard Injury Control Research Center also found that self-defense gun use is “rare and not more effective at preventing injury than other protective actions.”
That has led many who have studied mass shootings to conclude that by the time someone with the intent to kill shows up at a school, or a supermarket, or a house or worship with a gun, it’s too late to stop bloodshed. “The best way to prevent problems is to go upstream and really try to prevent things rather than wait until they’re about to happen, ...There’s no reason why we need to have AR-15s or AK-47s in civilian hands. That’s sort of crazy.”
The Patriot
☰
History
Time writer examines "good guy" hypothesis
Originalism? Hardly. That thar gun law ain't so newfangled
To hear defenders of unrestricted gun possession and the inevitably resulting violence one would think it had always been true. 'Tain't necessarily so. Here's a sampling of research into those self-serving claims.
"'Tombstone had much more restrictive laws on carrying guns in public in the 1880s than it has today,' says Adam Winkler, a professor and specialist in American constitutional law at UCLA School of Law. 'Today, you're allowed to carry a gun without a license or permit on Tombstone streets. Back in the 1880s, you weren't.' Same goes for most of the New West, to varying degrees, in the once-rowdy frontier towns of Nevada, Kansas, Montana, and South Dakota."
"The Wild West wasn't exactly full of quick-draw shootouts, clean-shaven cowboys, and tumbleweed. Historically inaccurate Western movie tropes change how we view the bygone era, from erasing certain groups to promoting a fictional view of the frontier that distorts the truth. Most frontier towns followed strict gun control laws, for example, which banned open carrying. And men avoided duels on main street - instead, it was easier to ambush your enemies outside of town." (Gun-totin' "real men" haven't changed much, it appears. -Ed.)
"'Tombstone had much more restrictive laws on carrying guns in public in the 1880s than it has today,' says Adam Winkler, a professor and specialist in American constitutional law at UCLA School of Law. 'Today, you're allowed to carry a gun without a license or permit on Tombstone streets. Back in the 1880s, you weren't.' Same goes for most of the New West, to varying degrees, in the once-rowdy frontier towns of Nevada, Kansas, Montana, and South Dakota."
"The Wild West wasn't exactly full of quick-draw shootouts, clean-shaven cowboys, and tumbleweed. Historically inaccurate Western movie tropes change how we view the bygone era, from erasing certain groups to promoting a fictional view of the frontier that distorts the truth. Most frontier towns followed strict gun control laws, for example, which banned open carrying. And men avoided duels on main street - instead, it was easier to ambush your enemies outside of town." (Gun-totin' "real men" haven't changed much, it appears. -Ed.)
Categories
Recent Posts
- Former President is not the Real Story
- Real tough guys speak out on weapons of war
- Nonsense and non-sequiturs in defense of "freedom"
- Lewiston, Maine grapples with aftermath of mass shooting
- Regulating guns impossible, or impractical, or maybe not
- Time writer examines "good guy" hypothesis
- Originalism? Hardly. That thar gun law ain't so newfangled
- Review of firearms deaths shows few surprises
- Cultural precursors of today's gun obsessions
- No Secret Guns!
- Poet accuses the other NRA
- New York attorney general sues to dissolve National Rifle Assn.
- NRA Silent on Saugus High Shooting